Why Are We The Good Guys?: Reclaiming Your Mind From The Delusions Of Propaganda

By David Cromwell

One of the unstated assumptions of the Western international is that we're nice defenders of human rights,
a unfastened press and some great benefits of industry economics. error should be made alongside the best way, even perhaps
tragic mistakes of judgement resembling the 2003 invasion of Iraq. however the winning view is that the West is
essentially a strength for strong within the wider international. Why Are We the nice men? is a provocative problem
of this fake ideology. David Cromwell digs underneath ordinary debts of an important matters reminiscent of international
policy, weather switch and the consistent fight among state-corporate strength and real democracy.
The robust evidence-based research of present affairs is leavened by way of a few of the formative experiences
that led the writer to question the fundamental delusion of Western benevolence: from schoolroom
experiments in democracy, publicity to radical rules at domestic, and a mercy undertaking whereas at sea;
to an unforeseen come upon with former overseas Secretary Robin prepare dinner, the struggles to put up
hard-hitting journalism, and the founding of Media Lens in 2001.

Show description

Preview of Why Are We The Good Guys?: Reclaiming Your Mind From The Delusions Of Propaganda PDF

Best Democracy books

The Science of Liberty: Democracy, Reason, and the Laws of Nature

“Ferris is a grasp analogist who conveys his insights at the background of cosmology with a lyrical aptitude. ” —The long island occasions publication evaluation within the technological know-how of Liberty, award-winning writer Timothy Ferris—called “the top well known technological know-how author within the English language this day” by means of the Christian technology computer screen and “the most sensible technology author of his iteration” through the Washington Post—makes a passionate case for technological know-how because the thought in the back of the increase of liberalism and democracy.

Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We the People Can Correct It)

Levinson argues that too a lot of our Constitution's provisions advertise both unjust or useless govt. below the prevailing blueprint, we will be able to neither rid ourselves of incompetent presidents nor guarantee continuity of presidency following catastrophic assaults. less significant, probably, yet definitely problematical, is the appointment of ideally suited courtroom judges for all times.

Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815 (Oxford History of the United States)

The Oxford background of the us is by means of a long way the main revered multi-volume background of our kingdom. The sequence comprises 3 Pulitzer Prize winners, ny instances bestsellers, and winners of the Bancroft and Parkman Prizes. Now, within the latest quantity within the sequence, one in every of America's so much esteemed historians, Gordon S.

Additional info for Why Are We The Good Guys?: Reclaiming Your Mind From The Delusions Of Propaganda

Show sample text content

Senior BBC managers and editors do not need to be informed to help the government’s most important time table goods; it comes evidently to them, differently they'd by no means were filtered into their cozy, increased, establishment-friendly positions. (Or, at the very infrequent social gathering once they overstep the mark, as Gavyn Davies and Greg Dyke came across following Andrew Gilligan’s revelations of presidency ‘sexing up’ of WMD propaganda, they're made to pay the fee. ) accordingly, the BBC Radio four at the present time programme may supply most sensible billing in January 2003 to a doubtful declare that Iraq used to be getting ready to take advantage of chemical guns may still the united states invade. Unsigned handwritten ‘documents,’ provided to the BBC by way of the Iraqi nationwide Coalition, an competition workforce supposedly with broad ties to Iraqi militia, shaped the root for this ‘news tale. ’69 Predictably, the records ‘were seized on through Downing road as displaying that President Saddam used to be getting ready to exploit chemical guns within the occasion of conflict and that he used to be no longer complying with UN resolutions. ’70 Later within the day, the BBC looked as if it would have sponsored off a bit, with diplomatic correspondent Bridget Kendall noting in an internet information document that the gang that had ‘provided those files has vested pursuits in seeing Saddam Hussein undermined, so it's very tricky to evaluate no matter if we should always think the records. ’ She extra that ‘the timing in their unencumber is important at a time while the USA and the united kingdom try to win over opinion to their method of the Iraq main issue. ’71 The belated sceptical tone used to be welcome, however the wanted impression had already been conveyed via the wide airtime dedicated to the preliminary tale by means of the agenda-setting this day programme: retaining the extent of worry in Britain and therefore supporting to facilitate a warfare on Iraq; a conflict that had not anything to do with disarming the rustic of alleged guns of mass destruction, and every little thing to do with keep watch over of, and entry to, oil assets and oil earnings, strengthening Western regulate within the sector, and demonstrating to the area at huge that the USA wouldn't tolerate any threats to its strength. in the meantime, genuine information that may have heavily uncovered this Western schedule could have been quietly famous in passing, yet infrequently acquired the vast assurance that establishment-friendly information agendas consistently call for. Witness the digital burying of the revelations that, at the eve of struggle, UN groups investigated the websites of Blair’s notorious file of Iraq’s WMD and came across not anything untoward. One tiny passage on the finish of an editorial through Richard Norton-Taylor within the dad or mum handled the investigated websites: ‘The govt, in the meantime, stated the day past that UN inspectors had visited the entire websites pointed out in its intelligence-backed file yet had no longer chanced on “any symptoms” of guns of mass destruction. Nor have been there any indicators of “programmes for his or her creation on the sites,” Mike O’Brien, the international workplace minister, advised the Labour MP Harry Cohen. ’ the final word used to be given to the govt interpretation of this publicity of its totally fraudulent file: specifically, the ludicrous advice given via O’Brien ‘that, given the development exposure the govt. gave to the websites, “it isn't really solely unbelievable that the inspectors did not discover any proof.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.23 of 5 – based on 12 votes