The Prohibition of Torture in Exceptional Circumstances

Can torture be justified in remarkable conditions? during this well timed paintings, Michelle Farrell asks how and why this question has develop into one of these important debate. She argues that the ticking bomb situation is a fiction which blinds us to the truth of torture and investigates what it truly is that that situation fails to symbolize. Farrell goals to reframe how we expect approximately torture, and significantly displays at the historic and modern ways to its use in unprecedented events. She demonstrates how torture, from its use in Algeria to the 'War on Terror', has been misrepresented, and appraises the legalist, extra-legalist and absolutist checks of exception to the torture prohibition. using Giorgio Agamben's concept of the country of exception as a foil, Farrell deconstructs those techniques and is going directly to suggest her personal idea of remarkable torture.

Show description

Preview of The Prohibition of Torture in Exceptional Circumstances PDF

Best Law books

McGraw-Hill's Real Estate Law for Paralegals

Genuine property legislations for Paralegals offers scholars with a transparent, easy-to-understand, and fascinating textual content during which they are going to know about genuine estate, own estate, and all the features inherent in genuine property. The textual content contains a bankruptcy committed exclusively to actual property closings. the scholars have entry to various workouts, instances, and hands-on studying assignments (including pattern kinds) masking issues starting from “Regulations and Encumbrances” to “Recording Statutes and Examinations.

The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford Monographs in International Law)

Funding defense treaties often supply for the duty to regard investments quite and equitably, no matter if the wording of the rule of thumb and its courting with the generic foreign average could vary. The open-textured nature of the guideline, the ambiguous courting among the imprecise treaty and both obscure primary principles, and States' interpretations of the content material and dating of either ideas (not to say the frequency of profitable invocation by way of traders) make this factor essentially the most debatable element of funding safety legislations.

The Law of State Immunity (Oxford International Law Library)

Revised and up-to-date to incorporate fresh advancements when you consider that 2013, the 3rd version of The legislations of country Immunity presents an in depth advisor to the operation of the foreign rule of kingdom immunity which bars one State's nationwide courts from workout legal or civil jurisdiction over claims made opposed to one other kingdom.

The Decolonization of International Law: State Succession and the Law of Treaties (Oxford Monographs in International Law)

The difficulty of nation succession is still a necessary and complicated point of interest for public foreign legal professionals, but it has remained unusually proof against potent articulation. The formative interval during this appreciate was once that of decolonization which marked for lots of the time while overseas legislations 'came of age' and while the guarantees of the UN constitution will be learned in a world neighborhood of sovereign peoples.

Extra info for The Prohibition of Torture in Exceptional Circumstances

Show sample text content

A couple of humans have learn and commented on drafts of this paintings. i'd rather wish to thank Niamh Hayes, Andrea Breslin and John Reynolds for nice reviews and proofreads, consistently on the correct time. i might additionally wish to thank Fiona de Londras for her splendidly severe interpreting of the creation, let alone her encouragement alongside the way in which. All error are, after all, my very own. i want to thank the nationwide collage of eire, Galway for at first delivering me with a doctoral fellowship and for later delivering me with a Write-Up Bursary . i'd additionally wish to thank the nationwide college of eire for the award in 2010 of NUI E. J. Phelan Postgraduate Fellow in overseas legislation. With this Fellowship i used to be capable of dedicate my time to updating the Ph. D. for book. I undertook the Fellowship on the Irish Centre for Human Rights and benefited rather a lot from the adventure of being a member of employees there. eventually and particularly, i need quite often to thank my family – rapid and prolonged  – and my shut buddies. My mom and dad, Brigid and Michael, are remarkable humans. they've got by no means doubted my selected occupation course, tough and unrewarding because it can have regarded to them now and then. also they are forever selfless. To them and my brother Neil i have to additionally supply detailed thank you for closing sufferer with me throughout the write-up interval. i have to thank my brother Stuart for being this kind of trustworthy resource of cheer. Clare and Enagh, i have to thank for the ethical help; it’s stable to understand you are consistently there. Ta bl e of C a se s eu Commission/Court of Human Rights Aksoy v. Turkey (App. No. 21987/93) ECHR 26 November 1996, 72–3 Aydin v. Turkey (App. No. 23178/94) ECHR 25 September 1997, seventy three Chahal v. uk (App. No. 22414/93) ECHR 15 November 1996, 57–9 Denmark et al. v. Greece (The Greek Case) (1969) 12 Yearbook of the eu conference on Human Rights, 3–4, 55–6, 68–70, seventy four, 245 Denezi and Others v. Cyprus (App. Nos. 25316–25321/94 and 27207/95) ECHR 23 could 2001, seventy six Dikme v. Turkey (App. No. 20869/92) ECHR eleven July 2000, seventy six Gäfgen v. Germany (App. No. 22978/05) ECHR 30 June 2008, 62–4 Gäfgen v. Germany (App. No. 22978/05) ECHR 1 June 2010, four, 64–8, 76–7, eighty two, 223 İhlan v. Turkey (App. No. 22277/93) ECHR 27 June 2000, four, seventy six eire v. uk (App. No. 5310/71) ECHR 18 January 1978, four, 70–2, seventy five eire v. uk (App. No. 5310/71) ecu fee of Human Rights 25 January 1976, 55–7, 69–70 Jalloh v. Germany (App. No. 54810/00) ECHR eleven July 2006, 12, 60–2, seventy six Kişmir v. Turkey (App. No. 27306/95) ECHR 31 could 2005, four Othman (Abu Qatada) v. uk (App. No. 8139/09) ECHR 17 January 2012, 59–60 Saadi v. Italy (App. No. 37201/06) ECHR 28 February 2008, 58–60 Selmouni v. France (App. No. 25803/94) ECHR 28 July 1999, four, 75–6 Soering v. uk (App. no. 14038/88) ECHR 7 July 1989, fifty seven Tomasi v. France (App. No. 12850/87), ECHR 27 August 1992, fifty seven Human Rights Committee Rodríguez v. Uruguay, conversation No. 322/1988, UN document. CCPR/ C/51/D/322/1988 (1994), 44–5 Committee opposed to Torture Danilo Dimitrijevic v.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.10 of 5 – based on 12 votes
Categories Law