The simplest movies of 2015 as voted for by way of 168 critics and the 12 months in assessment, Alejandro González Iñarritu on The Revenant and Nora Ephron, queen of the romcom. Plus man Maddin, Terence Davies, Raoul Peck, Haile Gerima, Cecile Emeke and masses more…
Quick preview of Sight & Sound [UK] (January 2016) PDF
Similar Film Criticism books
Initially released in Paris, it is a number of Hollywood's darkest and most sensible saved secrets and techniques from the pen of Kenneth Anger, a former baby motion picture actor who grew as much as turn into one in every of America's major underground film-makers.
A useful set of career-length interviews with the German genius hailed via François Truffaut as "the most crucial movie director alive"Most of what we have now heard approximately Werner Herzog is unfaithful. The sheer variety of fake rumors and downright lies disseminated in regards to the guy and his movies is really excellent.
Here's a secret: in 1939, while the Hollywood Studio method, on the top of its strength, produced such movies as long past with the Wind, Ninotchka, Stagecoach, The Wizard of ounces, Mr. Smith is going to Washington, and Wuthering Heights, the films' number-one box-office charm used to be now not Gable, Garbo, Wayne, Garland, Stewart, or Olivier.
- Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown (BFI Modern Classics)
- Dr. Strangelove (BFI Film Classics)
- What is Film Noir?
- Signatures of the Visible (Routledge Classics)
- Los Olvidados (BFI Film Classics)
Additional info for Sight & Sound [UK] (January 2016)
Yet appealing because the reminiscence of that second is, the glamour of these years among Breathless and Weekend (1967) is ﬁnally incidental to Godard’s energy. The ﬁlm theorist David Bordwell has argued that Godard is basically a story artist rather than a poet, which i've got contended long ago. yet i assume that we’re either unsuitable within the experience that BREEDING CONTEMPT Brigitte Bardot and Michel Piccoli in Le Mépris, now as a rule considered as one in every of Godard’s maximum ﬁlms yet person who used to be many times pushed aside as his sizeable foreign sell-out February 2016 | Sight&Sound | forty nine JEAN-LUC GODARD driver In narrative phrases, Godard’s ﬁlms, comparable to Pierrot le fou (1965, under) and Vivre sa vie (1962, bottom), don't loads boost as acquire 50 | Sight&Sound | February 2016 Godard hasn't ever been primarily whatever. Poet, visible artist, storyteller, thinker, essayist, ethnographer, sociologist, elegist – in any given ﬁlm he's all the above, although by no means all whilst. each person Godard ﬁlm is a checklist of moving registers, from the delicate to the rock-solid, from the elegiac to the shrilly satirical, from the intimate to the got rid of, from the non-public to the impersonal, and every rupture in tone and rhythm leaves its hint. within the subject of narrative, the ﬁlms don't rather advance, strictly conversing, up to they collect, and that comes with Vivre sa vie and Pierrot le fou, within which the extent of funding in narrative incident and personality varies from scene to scene. an analogous is going for all of Godard’s ﬁlms, together with each guy for Himself (1980) and Nouvelle obscure (1990) – their greatness doesn't lie of their narrative force. The exception is Le Mépris (1963), which stands completely and nakedly by myself in Godard’s physique of labor, within the experience that the tonal change-ups are subsumed within the emotional undertow. I ﬁnd Brody’s shut autobiographical interpretations of the person ﬁlms a bit too narrowly aligned from time to time with the nation of Godard’s romantic relationships, yet on the subject of Le Mépris his technique turns out not just apt yet unavoidable. That ﬁlm is so harrowingly acute from commencing to finish that all of it yet betrays the muse of a true deteriorating marriage. i assume it’s worthy noting right here that Le Mépris, now regularly one of Godard’s maximum ﬁlms, used to be commonly pushed aside as his monstrous overseas sell-out. one other paradox: whereas Godard has forged himself because the enemy of Moses and the partisan of the picture, his ﬁlms include and are surrounded by way of torrents of phrases, phrases and extra phrases. i do know of no different ﬁlmmaker so obviously beholden to phrases – spoken, screamed, sung, recited, quoted, dictated, written on blackboards and pc pages, hired as layout components. occasionally the phrases are supposed to be heard for that means and occasionally for verbal song, occasionally their functionality is dramatic and infrequently it’s philosophical. the various aforementioned interviews, the volumes of feedback and released screenplays and lectures and debates, and the ﬁlmed files of Godard conversing simply upload to the big, unconquerable mountain of phrases, phrases whose courting to the pictures is typically transparent and infrequently now not.