Dogfight: How Apple and Google Went to War and Started a Revolution

By Fred Vogelstein

Behind the sour competition among Apple and Google―and how it truly is reshaping the way in which we expect approximately technology

The upward push of smartphones and pills has altered the of constructing desktops. on the middle of this alteration are Apple and Google, businesses whose philosophies, leaders, and advertisement acumen have steamrolled the contest. within the age of Android and the iPad, those organisations are locked in a feud that would play out not only within the cellular industry yet within the courts and on monitors round the world.
Fred Vogelstein has mentioned in this contention for greater than a decade and has infrequent entry to its significant gamers. In Dogfight, he's taking us into the workplaces and board rooms the place corporation dogma interprets into ruthless enterprise; in the back of outsize personalities like Steve Jobs, Apple's now-lionized CEO, and Eric Schmidt, Google's government chairman; and contained in the bargains, proceedings, and allegations that mould the best way we converse. Apple and Google are poaching every one other's staff. They bid up the cost of each one other's acquisitions for spite, they usually forge alliances with significant avid gamers like fb and Microsoft in pursuit of industry dominance.
Dogfight reads like a unique: shiny nonfiction with never-before-heard info. this is often greater than a narrative approximately what units will exchange our cellphones and laptops. it is approximately who will regulate the content material on these units and the place that content material will come from―about the way forward for media and the web in Silicon Valley, long island, and Hollywood.

Show description

Preview of Dogfight: How Apple and Google Went to War and Started a Revolution PDF

Similar Law books

McGraw-Hill's Real Estate Law for Paralegals

Actual property legislation for Paralegals offers scholars with a transparent, easy-to-understand, and fascinating textual content within which they'll know about genuine estate, own estate, and all the features inherent in genuine property. The textual content incorporates a bankruptcy committed exclusively to actual property closings. the scholars have entry to varied workouts, situations, and hands-on studying assignments (including pattern kinds) overlaying subject matters starting from “Regulations and Encumbrances” to “Recording Statutes and Examinations.

The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford Monographs in International Law)

Funding defense treaties more often than not supply for the duty to regard investments quite and equitably, no matter if the wording of the rule of thumb and its dating with the typical overseas general may perhaps fluctuate. The open-textured nature of the guideline, the ambiguous courting among the obscure treaty and both obscure universal ideas, and States' interpretations of the content material and dating of either ideas (not to say the frequency of profitable invocation via traders) make this factor some of the most arguable point of funding safeguard legislations.

The Law of State Immunity (Oxford International Law Library)

Revised and up to date to incorporate contemporary advancements because 2013, the 3rd version of The legislations of kingdom Immunity presents a close advisor to the operation of the overseas rule of kingdom immunity which bars one State's nationwide courts from exercise legal or civil jurisdiction over claims made opposed to one other country.

The Decolonization of International Law: State Succession and the Law of Treaties (Oxford Monographs in International Law)

The difficulty of country succession is still an important and intricate point of interest for public foreign attorneys, but it has remained surprisingly proof against powerful articulation. The formative interval during this admire was once that of decolonization which marked for plenty of the time whilst overseas legislations 'came of age' and whilst the guarantees of the UN constitution will be learned in a global neighborhood of sovereign peoples.

Extra resources for Dogfight: How Apple and Google Went to War and Started a Revolution

Show sample text content

The jury has now spoken. We applaud them for locating Samsung’s habit willful and for sending a noisy and transparent message that stealing isn’t correct. i'm very happy with the paintings that every of you do. this present day, values have received and that i wish the complete global listens. It was once exceptional rhetoric. Jobs were useless 9 months, however it felt as though he had written the observe himself. the general public acquired it. The hours and days following the decision turned a public family bonanza for Apple. Media world wide wrote breathlessly in regards to the case, pondering how Samsung and Google might be able to get over it. Samsung’s inventory fell greater than 6 percentage within the weeks after the decision. Apple’s already buoyant inventory rate rose 6 percentage. via the center of September—days sooner than it unveiled the iPhone 5—Apple’s inventory cost had hit an all-time excessive that made the corporate worthy $656 billion—the greatest industry capitalization ever recorded via a U. S. company. truthfully there has been beneficial little precept riding Apple’s lawsuit. It desired to win, and every little thing it did was once pushed by way of the strategies and approach essential to in attaining that aim, in keeping with those that labored at the case. yet for all of Apple’s rhetoric that’s not often astonishing. so much patent proceedings paintings this fashion. Going after Samsung in court docket used to be simply otherwise for Jobs and his successors to assault Android. Samsung’s Android telephones and drugs have been remaining the market-share hole among them and the iPhone and the iPad. the chance that Apple and Google have been in a winner-take-all platform warfare was once excessive. Apple proposal a bad, protracted lawsuit may well sluggish Samsung’s and Android’s development. in reality, the criminal attack on Samsung and Android was once a surprise of Jobs’s mercenary pondering, in line with one of many lawyers fascinated about the case. It wasn’t simply that Apple had sued a member of the Android group in almost each industrialized state on the earth. Apple successfully created one of many greatest patent legislation organizations on this planet to do it. It saved its in-house felony employees small. yet by the point of the Samsung trial, its 4 outdoors legislations organizations had approximately 300 legal professionals around the globe engaged on the case approximately full-time. The legal professional anticipated the costs to come back to approximately $200 million a 12 months. As of 2012 Apple had approximately fifty proceedings going opposed to Samsung by myself in ten assorted nations. And whereas Apple stoked the notion that it was once taking an immense possibility status as much as Samsung in public, executives knew Apple wasn’t taking a tremendous chance in any respect. for an organization with greater than $100 billion within the financial institution, the criminal charges have been a rounding blunders. It had home-field virtue. San Jose Federal court docket is ten miles clear of Apple headquarters and 5 thousand miles from Samsung’s. For the 3 weeks of testimony in August 2012 that the trial took up, media world wide will be full of Apple executives’ testimony accusing Samsung of copying their paintings and hurting their corporation. That, doubtless, might support promote extra iPads and iPhones. Apple believed that whether it misplaced, it will win.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.29 of 5 – based on 21 votes
Categories Law